China's Mobile Internet Messaging (IM) War, part 11: the battle is heating up

This is part 11 in this series. One can find the previous part (part 10) in this series here:

part 10 here

I am still keeping track of the weekly download statistics. The pattern I observed in part 10 is still valid. That is Netease/CHA (China Telecom)'s YiChat is still growing like crazy. Alibaba's LaiWang is a very strong grower. Sina's WeMeet is dying in front of our eyes.

In addition, there are two other new players that are getting into this space. One is from Shanda and another from a big retailer. But so far those two new players are not catching any traction at all.

Both Alibaba's LaiWang and Netease's YiChat had/will have major announcement. But first, some users statistics:

From the following article:

YiChat's super fast growth (in Chinese)

Netease's YiChat had already accumulated more than 30 million users. In addition, its user base are increased by 200k per day. Of all users accounts, 28% of them are daily Active account users. Thus, about 30*0.28 = 8.4 million users are using YiChat every day.

Considering YiChat starts operation on 8/19/2013, it is able to accomplish this feat in less than 2.5 months. I had never heard of any social networking product that are able to grow this fast out of the starting gate, anywhere.

But Alibaba is going all out for its LaiWang product. From the following article:

Alibaba is going all in (in Chinese)

Alibaba is offering all LaiWang users of free mobile data traffic cost for users in 4 major provinces. This trial will last 2 months for now. Alibaba would also likely to expand this free service.

Not to be outdone, Netease had just announced that it will have a major announcement on 11/8/2013. From the following articles:

Netease's major announcement (in Chinese)

(in Chinese)

(in Chinese)

The detail is still a little unclear. But it looks like CHA/Netease will expand the free data service offer for its YiChat users not just to all CHA users, but all users in China. It will also covers users from China Unicom (CHU) and China Mobile (CHL) users.

Of course, the cost of these free service is so large that is so far beyond what Netease can afford. Most likely, Netease is just alone for a free ride. Either the cost will come from CHA (China Telecom) or China Unicom and China Mobile will become partners of YiChat. We will find out more details on 11/8/2013.

end

China's Mobile Internet Messaging (IM) War, part 9: YiChat gets VOIP

One can find part 8 of China's Mobile IM war here:

Part 8 here

Yesterday, YiChat provided a major update and upgrade from version 1.1.2 to v.1.2. Please see the following articles for details:

Article 1 (in Chinese)

Article 2 (in Chinese)

Article 3 (in Chinese)

Article 4 (in Chinese)

Two major functions are added to YiChat. First, YiChat will start Voice Over IP (VOIP) service. In addition, calls from foreign country to China will be free (there could be a time limit however). Since YiChat has a sugar daddy in China Telecom, it will be China Telecom that will supply all the cost for this free service.

The second major function is that when a user uses YiChat and when the other party doesn't have access to internet, YiChat can convert the message to either SMS (if the message is text) or telephone messages (if the message is voice).

None of these two functions will grow the users by a lot in the short term. But both are very significant.

It is nice to have a sugar daddy, especially a sugar daddy who is a monopoly. Skyp had been trying to get into China for a long time now. In addition, all of China's private companies had known that VOIP is an incredibly lucrative business to get into.

But Chinese government won't allow any private, be it foreign or domestic, to get into this area because of the objection of its three state owned telecom operators, China Mobile (CHL), China Unicom (CHU), and China Telecom (CHA).

But now, Netease is able to get into this area through its cooperation with China Telecom. This is potentially a lot bigger than China's Mobile IM. If China truly allows VOIP, it could completely overtake all of China's telecommunication industry, considering the horrible reputation of the three state own companies among ordinary Chinese.

At this point, VOIP is not fully allowed yet. But China is allowing a crack, and only for the telecoms and Netease.

I am certain at this point, companies like Tencent, Alibaba, Sina, Sohu, are drooling with envy with Netease's great luck.

The second major feature is very important in YiChat's competition with Tencent's WeChat. Almost all of the analysis in China are on whether YiChat can replace WeChat. Well, I think the possibility of that is zero. If somebody comes up with a product that basically does what Facebook does. Even if that product is superior to that of Facebook. The possibility of that product to replace Facebook is basically zero.

I guess YiChat could be to WeChat for what Google+ is to Facebook. It could become a 2nd place player in China's Mobile Internet Messaging market. But I think YiChat can be much more than that.

Here in the US, we have Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Instagram, Foursquare, Pinterest, etc. Any one person can have more than one social circle. Similarly in China, the top 3 are QQ, Weibo, and WeChat. But there is definitely more room for more.

But there are a basic limitation for the top 3 social media products. They are limited by that both side have to have internet access at the same time. This is where there is a niche for YiChat to thrive.

Because YiChat has the support of China Telecom, it provides its users free access to home phone and SMS (Short Messaging Service). Its true advantage that nobody else have is it allows its users  free access to 3 networks (internet, home phone, and SMS). This second feature is the start of Netease's attempt to start to integrate the three networks together. If China truly allows Netease to have full VOIP service, YiChat can combine that and we will have four networks integrated into one.

end.

TD-SCDMA Cost comparison and potential problem areas

My last post on TD-SCDMA is as follows:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/04/other-related-td-scdma-news.html

The following is another comparison site by Netease Tech department.

http://tech.163.com/mobile/special/001127IM/td_scdma_useful.html

There are a lot of photos in this site. Not much new information from the last review by Netease. But it does have the cost structure in the table form. I will list the cost comparison between TD-SCDMA vs GSM in the following table:

	Type		TD-SCDMA	GSM
Monthly Fee	Monthly Fee		50/month	50/month
Phone	Voice	Local	Caller = .4/min, Called = Free	.4/min
		Roaming	Caller = .6/min, Called = .4/min	Caller = .6/min, Called = .4/min
		Long Distance	.07 per 6 second	.07 per 6 second
	Video	Local	Caller = .6/min, Called = Free	NA
		Roaming	Caller = .9/min, Called = .6/min	NA
		Long Distance	.1 per 6 second	NA
	Package Deal		$28 for 150 minutes	NA
			$58 for 350 minutes
			$88 for 600 minutes
CRBT	Domestic		.6/message	.6/message
	International		.8/message	.6/message
Internet	Internet Cost		$10 for 30MB	$5 for 10MB
			$50 for 200MB	$20 for 50MB
			$200 for 4GB	$100 for 800MB
			$300 per 8G	$200 for 2GB

From the above table, the better service (TD-SCDMA) actually cost less than the existing and inferior service (GSM) for services common to both. In addition, for services that are unique to TD-SCDMA, the cost is extremely reasonable.

Considering how Chinese youth regards their mobile phones as status symbols, I am certain there will be a lot of demand for this service. Also considering that this is a brand new service, I am also certain that the handset makers are probably going to be conservative in producing the mobile phones. Thus, I think the supply will be limited.

From the review so far, this technology seems to be more mature than I originally thought. But several problem areas may start to emerge. I will list them out below:

1. Lack of coverage. This is to be expected at this early stage of network deployment.

2. Good voice but unstable video. As video requires more resource for the network, lack of network coverage may contribute to this. But other factors that may point to the fundamental deficiency of the TD-SCDMA may be involved. If China Mobile build out the network, and this problem still exist, we may have a problem.

3. Unstable coverage while moving. If there are insufficient coverage, as the caller or the called moved around, it went in and out of areas that have coverage, the result is of course unstable coverage. But if may also point to problems that is more fundamental. This is another area to be looked at.

4. Power consumption issue. There are conflicting report on this. But we know only a handful of companies have build handsets for this standard so far. Most of these companies are domestic and not very sophisticated in designing handsets. In addition, there are usually significant power saving between the 1^st and 2^nd generation handset design by the same company. I don’t know if the standard itself caused the power consumption issue. But it is probably going to take 1 year until the second generation handsets start to arrive before we can say with any certainty about the cause of this issue.

5. Good voice and video service but unstable internet browsing experience. This actually could be a problem that is difficult to solve. Again, have to keep track of further review that come out to see if this is a problem.

6. Nobody to call because nobody have the 3G service yet. Well, this is the chicken and egg question. This is really to be expected.

7. Only 6 handset makers and very little handset selections. Again, this is the chicken and egg question. This is to be expected.

8. Very little new ingenious services that uses the extra bandwidth. Since this is the start of 3G, this is to be expected. But there are another factor involved. If Chinese government allows its mobile operators such as China Mobile to be both the competitor and regulator, like what happed with the WVAS area, then there won’t be any new ingenious service. At this point, China Mobile and China Unicom serve as monopoly in the area of WVAS. As a result, there is no inventiveness. The small WVAS have to resort to junk emails, or porns to stay alive. Unless China government changes the underlining structure, nothing is going to happen in this area.

9. People are waiting for the real 3G. It is possible that most people are waiting for the roll out of WCDMA and CDMA2000. This could be the big one. I don’t know about the psychic of average Chinese youth. Do they go after the latest fad or do they think TD-SCDMA is just a precursor to the real thing (WCDMA and CDMA2000).

In my mind, TD-SCDMA will either get 60% of the market share of China or 0%. Nothing in between. In pure free market condition, TD-SCDMA will not have a chance in hell when compared to the more established standards. The only way it can survive is if Chinese government give TD-SCDMA a 3 to 4 years head start by a proven operator (that is China Mobile). Yes, it will not be permitted by WTO. But I fully expect by the time WTO has furnished its verdict, it will be fate-accompli. If that is the case, I don’t think average Chinese youth will wait that long to use the 3G service. Therefore, TD-SCDMA will get the dominate share of China’s market.

We will probably have to wait for a few months for more reviews to see how the trial goes. But so far, everything look good so far. That may mean we may be seeing a short trial period and roll out can be as soon as this summer. If that is the case, we are most likely seeing demand far exceeds supplies.

Finally, a kick ass TD-SCDMA phone. It is made by Lenovo. See the following two links for the video demonstrations.

http://www.slashgear.com/lenovo-ideapad-u8-more-details-and-a-video-of-the-interface-0811094.php

http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/02/video-lenovos-ideapad-u8-mid-teases-with-intels-atom/

The name of the phone is Lenovo Ideapad U8. It is still in prototype. The phone is just awesome. If TD-SCDMA solved all its technical and roll-out issues, there is no way the average Chinese youth won’t go after this handset.

Other related TD-SCDMA news

My last post on the TD-SCDMA can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/04/negative-review-of-td-scdma.html

I am going to put some miscellaneous information about TD-SCDMA in this article.

From the following article:

http://www.thetelecom.co.uk/20080228/td-scdma-sales-in-china-level-off/

China Mobile Communications, China Telecom and China Network Communications purchased 969M of TD-SCDMA equipment in 4Q07. ZTE accounts for 45.8% of total, Datang with 27.2% and TD tech with 14.9% of total.

A iPhone clone that is more iPhone. http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/340/C11524/

How about an iPhone clone that can provide 3G services and have better camera than the iPhone? You think an “iPhone” that is even better than a real iPhone can sell in China? Oh, yes!

From the following news: http://tech.sina.com.cn/t/2008-04-03/07202117436.shtml

China Mobile announced that they had already build 14119 base stations for TD-SCDMA. They said within the same 8 trial cities, they had build more infra-structure for TD-SCDMA in 300 days than they did for GSM in 10 years.

From the following site: http://shanghaiist.com/2008/04/01/china_rolls_out.php

One can see that the price of TD-SCDMA services are extremely competitive. If China Mobile keeps these prices and there are no show-stoppers in the trial, given how the young Chinese considering their mobile phones as status symbol, this thing is going to explode.

Finally, let me see how can SPRD take advantage of the coming roll-out of TD-SCDMA.

They have two chips that support TD-SCDMA. The first chip is SC8800D:

http://www.spreadtrum.com/chs/service.asp?name=mobile&product_name=mobile_SC8800D

It can support GSM, GPRS, and TD-SCDMA. It has a maximum download speed of 384kbps and upload speed of 128kbps. It uses a 100MHz ARM processor core.

The second chip is SC8800H:

http://www.spreadtrum.com/chs/service.asp?name=mobile&product_name=mobile_SC8800H

It can support GSM, GPRS, TD-SCDMA, and HSDPA. It has a maximum download speed of 1.6Mbps. It can support 5M pixel camera. It uses a 200MHz ARM processor core.

I believe the SC8800D is out on 2004 and the SC8800H is out on 2007. At this point, China Mobile’s trial is only for the 384kbps version. Thus, only the SC8800D will benefit. But the SC8800H will benefit as China Mobile rolls out the HSDPA version of TD-SCDMA in the future.

Negative review of TD-SCDMA

My last report on TD-SCDMA can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/04/evaluation-of-td-scdma-by-sina-tech.html

The review so far had been good. But I am sure there are negative report also. I found one and it can be found here:

http://tech.sina.com.cn/t/2008-04-07/09452121655.shtml

It is in a newspaper called People’s Net Market Paper. I will translate the main point below.

TD-SCDMA has excellent voice quality. It is even better than the existing GSM.

There is a lot of coverage issues. There are a lot of areas that only have one or two bars. Some places doesn’t even have any bars. The calls are very unstable in places where the coverage is bad. There are places that one can’t even make a call successfully.

The reviewer made a video phone call. The quality is good. But there seem to be delay once a while. The download speed is very good. The reviewer can get a download speed up to 200kB/second (the advertised top speed is 385kB/second).

When it is stationary, the reviewer can have excellent video phone or video/TV programming. The TV volume is loud and clear for the TV programs. But when moving, such as in the subway or on the bus, the speed degrades badly. In a lot of cases, the connection will break.

But there is a very serious battery issue. After only 20 minutes of phone calls and after downloading several short video clips, it already spent half of the battery.

Some customers complained about the instability of the calls. Some calls gets disconnected. It seems like the instability of phone calls are the biggest issue.

From this article, it is hard to tell what caused the instability of the call. If it is the coverage issue, it is to be expected. It can be easily solved by adding more base stations. Mobile operators such as China Mobile are doing that any way. This is really not the issue of the standard itself and can be solved easily by adding more base stations to provide better coverage.

But if the instability is caused by the underlining technical deficiencies of the standard itself, then we will have a big problem. This then become a fundamental problem that no amount of additional infrastructure build can remedy.

It is hard to tell which is the case at this point. But during this early stage, the lack of coverage is to be expected.

Another problem is the power consumption issues. There seems to be conflicting reports on whether this is the issue. Even if it is, it is not clear whether the issue is caused by the standard itself or caused by the deficiency of the handset design. If it is the handset design, it will be solved easily by the future design optimizations of the handset companies. But if it is the technical deficiencies of the standard itself, it could present a very big problem.

At this point, we will probably have to wait for a couple of months of trials to see whether there are patterns emerge.

Evaluation of TD-SCDMA by Sina Tech reporter

My last post on the TD-SCDMA can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/04/evaluation-of-td-scdma-by-sohu-tech.html

Netease and Sohu both have reports on the TD-SCDMA. Sina is of course not going to be left out. For Sina’s case, they did a video review:

http://video.sina.com.cn/tech/other/bn/2008-04-01/21153581.shtml

One can see TD-SCDMA in action in real time. Since this is only a 5 minutes review, this is not going to be a detailed review. But seeing a TD-SCDMA phone in action provides a lot of insight that a written review can’t.

In this video review, Sina’s tech reporter talked about the five advantages of TD-SCDMA phones over the existing 2G and 2.5G phones in China.

First, the phones are multi-standards. The caller can use TD-SCDMA or the existing 2G/2.5G services on the same phone.

Second, it provides high speed internet browsing. Compare to the existing 2G or 2.5G services, TD-SCDMA behave like a broadband service (borrowing the term used for ADSL or Cable Modem). The current version of TD-SCDMA can support up to 384kbps. Sina’s reporter of course went to www.sina.com.cn for demo in this review.

Third, it has video phone feature. In the demonstration, the quality seems very nice.

Fourth, much higher multi-media capability. Now, when one wants to watch TV programs, video clips, or sounds, one doesn’t have to wait forever to download the files. With real time streaming, one can watch these multimedia programs in real time. Again, the demonstration of watching a movie in real time is very nice. The quality of the movie seems to be very nice.

Fifth, the high speed allows for high quality JAVA applications. Sina’s reporter uses the example of keeping track of stocks and stock technical analysis (in real time) as an example.

Finally, the reporter also talked about the extremely competitive pricing of TD-SCDMA announced by China Mobile.

Overall, I will have to say this review gives a glowing report for TD-SCDMA.

On a related subject that I had been keeping track of, the subject of the intense China’s portal’s video/TV war, Sina also had another video report on the TD-SCDMA trial. That video is here: http://video.sina.com.cn/tech/t/bn/2008-04-01/12093579.shtml

There weren’t anything technical about this report. But one can see that Sina is really starting to behave like a CNN or a MSNBC. Sina has really transforming itself from a text based company to a video/TV/multimedia based company.

My last post on the subject of portal’s video war can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2007/09/sohu-video-tv-stations-opened.html

At this point, Sina seems to be doing the best job. But with Sohu’s Olympic initiative, it is going to be a war between the two.

Evaluation of TD-SCDMA by Sohu Tech reporter

My last post on the TD-SCDMA can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/04/td-scdma-reviewed-by-netease-tech-news.html

After Netease did a review for the new 3G service trial, Sohu will of course not going to be left out of this. A Sohu tech reporter did a three part reviews as well. I will give a brief translation.

On 4/1/2008, he did the first part of the review:

http://macropandabo.blog.sohu.com/83451568.html

This is the first day that TD-SCDMA can be tested. Most people this reporter called haven’t got the new features yet. Not much can be said in this report. The only thing is that this reporter think the quality of the voice call is excellent.

In the second report, it is probably later on in the same day, 4/1/2008, he talked about a little bit of more features:

http://macropandabo.blog.sohu.com/83530680.html

In this report, he talked about using the video phone feature. It seems like the quality is very good. He is even able to see the background of the other caller clearly. He also talked about the video phone feature when both caller and receiver are traveling with speed. He was on a bus traveling about 80km/hour (about 50 miles/hour) while the other caller is in the subway traveling about 80km/hour (50miles/hr), there are degradation to the voice and video quality of the call. But overall, it is acceptable.

Out of 20 video phone calls he made that day, one can’t receive the video image. But that is probably more to do with the problem with the mobile handset of the received caller.

He also talked about the battery issue. For that day, that reporter made 20 voice calls, 20 video calls, 10 short messages, and 10 minutes worth of WAP. Afterward, the battery is virtually out. The reporter felt it is very battery consuming.

The third report is based on his experience on the same day (4/1/2008) also.

http://macropandabo.blog.sohu.com/83618512.html

In this report, he talked about his experience on the fastest train in the world, Shanghai’s Pudong Airport Maglev (Magnetic Levitation) train. Some information about this train can be found here:

http://home.wangjianshuo.com/archives/20030809_pudong_airport_maglev_in_depth.htm

He arrived at the Shanghai airport and took the Maglev train. He made a video phone call while on the train. At the beginning, with the train stationary, the quality of the call is excellent. But as the train started moving and getting to about 50 km/hour (31 mile/hour), he started to notice the degradation of the quality of the call. When the speed of the train gets to 180 km/hour (112 miles/hour), the call is disconnected. The speed of the train gets faster until it reaches about 300 km/hour (186 miles/hour). At that speed, video phone is not possible. However, even at that speed, he is able to conduct voice call. There are degradation to the quality of the voice call at 300 km/hour, but the phone call is understandable and acceptable. That reporter believed that TD-SCDMA passed the speed test since it will not be possible for 2G phones to keep the link at this extreme speed.

Overall, he felt the quality of various services for the TD-SCDMA is excellent. But there are coverage issues. There are some problem inside the hotel, inside the subway and in Shanghai’s rotating tower.

Also, he already receive his first SMS junk mail. (Remember the issue with FMCN, I guess SMS junk mail is really bad if people already start to receive junk mail on the first day of a trial).

In summary, Sohu’s report seems to suggest two possible problems. First, he thinks there might be power consumption problem. Second, there might be coverage problem.

But from the amount of phone calls he made, I am not quite sure this is the problem. If I made the same amount of calls, it will probably drain the battery of my mobile phone also. In addition, usually the first generation handsets are electricity hogs. They are usually corrected in a few months. With better handset design (which is not an issue for the standard itself) and larger battery capacity, this doesn’t seem like a problem.

The second problem he mentioned, the coverage problem, is really to be expected. It is going to take China Mobile and China Unicom a few years to install tens of thousands of base stations all over the country. There will definitely be coverage problem at this early stage.

Interestingly, he didn’t mention the problem pointed out by Netease’s review, the instability of mobile internet browsing. That actually could be a bigger problem. We will just have to keep track of different reviews to see if unstable internet browsing is epidemic.

Finally, I think this review give me the impression that TD-SCDMA is more matured than I thought originally. It seems they had solved one of a supposed weakness, performance when one or both of callers are traveling at high speed.

As far, both reviews give me a lot of hope that speedy expansion of 3G is possible in China. Major expansion in months rather than in years seems more likely.

But we need to keep track of more reviews. There might just be some issues out there that nobody thought of that might come back to haunt us.

TD-SCDMA reviewed by Netease Tech News

My last post on China’s new 3G mobile phone (TD-SCDMA) can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2008/03/china-to-launch-trial-of-3g-mobile.html

On 3/26/2008, Netease Tech. department did a review on the new service. I believe it is the first such review. The article is as follows:

http://bbs.tech.163.com/bbs/tech02/67358158.html

My brief translation is as follows. The article had a lot of pictures. I would not copy the pictures here.

Starting April this year, China Mobile will provide TD-SCDMA trials on 9 cities in China.

The cost of the service is video phone of 0.6 RMB/minute and voice phone of 0.4 RMB/minute. The monthly service is 10 RMB/month for 30MB (?) of data, 50 RMB/month for 200MB of data, 200 RMB/month for 4G of data, and 300 RMB for 8G of data.

The SIM card for the TD-SCDMA is different than that of other standards. They are not inter-changeable.

First, Netease conducted voice phone calls. They found the voice quality very clear. As clear as the GSM network. There were no voice spike or fade or any other interruptions. For this test, they can only do the stationary voice calls. They will conduct the voice call when traveling in high speed in the future.

(My note. Phone call during high speed travel is one of the more problematic areas for cellular phones. Too bad Netease is not able to test this aspect.)

Next, Netease tested the video phone option. They found the image to be very clear. The video refresh rate is about 5 to 8 frame/seconds. It is less than regular TV (30 frame per second), but they found it acceptable for this purpose.

Next, they test the TD-SCDMA’s internet capability. At this point, they can support two capabilities, TD-CMWAP and TD-CMNET. At this point, the data rate supported by TD-CMWAP can be found by GPRS/EDGE. Therefore, it won’t be the selling point for TD-SCDMA. However, TD-CMNET is another story.

To use TD-CMNET over the existing 2G or 2.5G is almost like the difference of using ADSL (broadband) vs. 56k analog modem dial-up for desktop internet browsing.

Of course, Netease went to www.163.com for internet browsing test. They found it much faster than the existing GPRS/EDGE. It only take 3 to 4 second before the page start to load. The browsing afterward is extremely fast also.

At this point, the maximum data rate is 384kbps. They also heard that the next (half) generation TD-HSDPA 3.5G shall be here soon.

Next, Netease tested the TV viewing. It only takes 3 to 4 seconds before the TV program showing up. The quality is excellent. It has the about the same quality as the watching TV at home. The sound from the speaker phone is very good also.

In addition, one can use TD-SCDMA to perform remote control or remote surveillance functions. For example, to check the traffic condition of one’s travel destination. Or use TD-SCDMA phone to control the computer at home or home appliances.

They also watch an NBA game on the phone and found the quality excellent.

But they did found a few minor problem. They found, at the location where they done the test, the connection to the internet is not very stable. It disconnects a few times. They hope this is just a phenomenon during the trial.

In addition, they think the next generation TD-HSDPA shouldn’t be too far away. The license to operate TD-HSDPA had been recently granted to a few phone manufacturers. It shouldn’t be very long for this new service to come out.

Finally, they predict TD-SCDMA will be offered to the general public in June this year.

This concludes the review by Netease Tech department. From the review, it looks good. While I am certain there will be a lot of teething problems in the next two years, I believe Chinese users will tolerate them as long as they are not show stoppers. Except for the unstable internet connection, there doesn’t seem to be any show stoppers. We have to however, keep an eye on that as more reviews come in.

If TD-SCDMA can really get into commercial operation by June this year, it will really be great news to equipment manufactures such as SPRD and WVAS content providers such as SINA and KONG.

China to launch trial of 3G mobile phones

China Mobile (CHL) is going to start the TD-SCDMA commercial trial on 4/1/2008. The following is the news in English and in Chinese.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/wireless/phones/2008-03-28-china-3g_N.htm?csp=34

http://tech.sina.com.cn/t/2008-03-28/11182106926.shtml

My last post on WVAS is here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2007/04/rumored-china-mobiles-chl-wap-policy.html

The Chinese news from sina has a lot more information in them.

TD-SCDMA is a 3G cellular phone standard. The world only have three 3G standards, the WCDMA, the CDMA2000 and TD-SCDMA. WCDMA is the standard developed by Europe (its 2G equivalent is GSM). CDMA2000 is developed by American (its 2G equivalent is CDMA95). TD-SCDMA is developed by China.

It was a tremendous technical break through for China.

Chinese mobile operators don’t like TD-SCDMA. They have good reasons. A cellular phone standard is so complicated, it will be impossible for TD-SCDMA to be even close to the two existing standards in terms of performance and robustness.

Even if Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison are the one invented TD-SCDMA, it will be at least 10 years behind both the WCDMA and CDMA2000.

The only way TD-SCDMA can survive is for the Chinese government to dictate China’s mobile operator to use it.

But to conform to WTO charter, China has to give WCDMA and CDMA2000 level playing field. But if China follows the intend of WTO charter, TD-SCDMA won’t have any chance to survive.

But I guess lawyers have to have some use in them. I think China will do anything and everything to ensure TD-SCDMA will not just survive, but to thrive.

Expert had been predicting this date since 2005. It had been delayed so many times. The date is finally here. So this is a pretty big news.

I think there are several type of companies that will benefit from the wide-spread usage of TD-SCDMA.

First, equipment maker like SPRD will benefit for obvious reason. Second, I think WVAS companies such as KONG and SINA will benefit greatly. The WVAS companies that specialize in WAP will be the winner. KONG is betting it future survival on this date. SINA has been gearing all its web site to be compatible with WAP. For SINA, every story SINA generated have WAP counterparts. Both KONG and SINA had been throwing money into the drain for the past few years just to gear up for the arrival of 3G.

Of course, for the WVAS companies, the mobile operators such as CHL or CHU can throw monkey wrenches into this. But, unlike for SMS where KONG and SINA are just distributor and middlemen, now KONG and SINA will be content generators for the WAP. KONG and SINA will be in a stronger position. In addition, there is talks about China shaking up the mobile operators. That may prove positives to the WVAS companies since the mobile operators will be busying in re-structuring. Also, China will have a new ministry that will handle this function. The charter of the new super ministry can change also. That adds some uncertainties. The power of this industry is so lopsided tilt toward mobile operators such as CHL and CHU, any change to the existing structure can only help the WVAS companies such as KONG and SINA.

But according to sina link above, only 20,000 users will take part in the trial. There is no news of how long the trial will last. Therefore, it will not have any material contribution to all the companies that are discussed here. But in a year time, this could be an exciting growth driver for all the company mentioned here.

China Mobile and Sohu are top two Olympics brand in China

My last Olympics related post can be found here:

http://chinese-net-gaming-stock.blogspot.com/2007/09/battle-of-olympics-part4-conclusion.html

Just came across this news today.

http://article.pchome.net/content-533746.html

According to a Baidu's report, China Mobile is number 1, Sohu 2nd, Lenovo 3rd, and Samsung is the 4th most respected Olympics brand.

Others like Mcdonalds is 15th, Adidas 18th and Microsoft can't even crack the top 20.

Baidu compiled the report based on four categories, press coverage, government help, individual users’ respectability, and composite score. The final composite score is a composite of the first three scores.

China Mobile is number 1 in both press coverage and government help. It is the 2^nd most respected brand by average individual Chinese.

For Sohu, it has a composite score that gives it the number 2 ranked company regarding Olympics. It is only number 5 in both press coverage and government help. But its strength comes from the average Chinese users. Overwhelming individual Chinese users regard Sohu as the number 1 most respected brand with respect to Olympics. That catapults Sohu into the number 2 ranked company in China (regards to Olympics).

For Lenovo, it is number 3 in all three categories. Thus it gets a composite score of the 3^rd ranked most respected Olympics related company in China.

According to the Baidu report (can be found in http://2008.baidu.com), among all internet sites and portals, Sohu did a much better job in brand awareness for Olympics-related activities.

Sometimes, research reports from China can be deceiving or can be paid for by individual company. But I think this is different. Baidu is a direct competitor to Sohu (through Sogou), there is no reason for Baidu to pump Sohu's success. Thus, I believe the authenticity of this report.

As we get closer to Olympics, average Chinese users will gravitate toward the brand they respect and trust the most and that is Sohu (in Internet) and China Mobile (in Wireless). I think we are going to see acceleration in ad revenue from Sohu as the Olympics gets closer. Sohu is going to grab market shares from the likes of Sina, Netease, QQ, and Baidu. In the wireless area, we are probably going to see the same thing. That is China Mobile is probably going to gain more market shares from its competitors.

For the first three quarters in 2008, we are probably going to see some shift in favor of Sohu and China Mobile.

Rumored China Mobile’s (CHL) WAP policy change

Imaging the following scenario:

Southwestern Bell is your internet service provider. It is Saturday and you just got up. You decided to browse the internet. You turned on the computer and opened internet explorer. You would like to go to www.cbs.com

But instead of going there directly, you were re-directed to www.news.swbell.com first. You would need to click one more time before you were allowed to go to www.cbs.com.

Next, you would like to go to www.youtube.com. But youtube.com is classified by Southwestern Bell as a “black” site. First you are redirected to www.video.swbell.com. If you insist to go to youtube.com, you will get a message saying since youtube.com is considered a “black” site, you will be charged additional fee based on how much traffic you use through www.youtube.com.

Yes, I am talking about the sorry state of Wireless Value Added Service (WVAS). Here, in the United States, there is no WVAS industry since all the major service providers such as Sprint or Verizon had complete killed off any independent WVAS companies.

But in China, there used to be a thriving industry of WVAS companies. A lot of WVAS companies are unethical, but just like early days of internet, eventually, the bad will get weeded out.

But instead of following Japan, the WVAS industry is following USA where a whole industry died out because it allows the service providers (like China mobile or China Unicom) to be both competitor and regulator.

According to the following two links (this is reported in all major portals, I only provide the two links for representation purpose):
http://www.techweb.com.cn/news/2007-04-20/184367.shtml
http://www.techweb.com.cn/news/2007-04-19/183716.shtml

On May 17, China Mobile is going to have three policy changes.

When 3G arrives in China, WAP will be the most lucrative business. As a result, there are 10’s of thousand independent WAP sites coming out in the last two years. China Mobile’s own WAP site is losing market share fast.

Against this backdrop, CHL is going to publish three policy changes on May 17, 2007. The policy changes are done in the name of providing a filtering service to protect the public from harmful contents. The proposed changes are:

1). All WAP web sites will be first redirect to CHL’s WAP site first before going to the intended WAP site.
2). All WAP companies will be classified into three categories: White, Grey, and Black. Users could get complete access to the white’s site. But the white site is on CHL’s WAP platform. Users might not even know he/she is on company white’s web site. Users can only get limited access to the Grey sites. Users either can’t access Black web sites, or requires extra bandwidth charge to access Black sites.
3). Users will be charged extra bandwidth charges for going to Black sites.

I am sure all these represents extra revenues to CHL in the short term. That is until they kill off the whole industry. Then nobody make any money.

At this point, this is a very reliable rumor. I think if there is little public outcry, the rumor will become policy.

Is this what China really wants, the extinction of a thriving industry?

I don’t blame CHL. They are just doing what all monopoly is suppose to do. But how dumb can the Chinese regulator gets. How can they let a competitor be a regulator?

What is next, let a fox guards a hen house? Or a cat protects a bird nest?